(Florian Cramer, Aymeric Mansoux, Michael Murtaugh, 2010)
We each introduce ourselves briefly.
We have to admit that this title is a hyperbole. Actually, we are not talking about our entire art school, but only one study programme: the Networked Media Master at the Piet Zwart Institute of the Willem de Kooning Academy in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. It is a small, very international and cross-disciplinary new media design and art programme in the graduate school of Rotterdam's traditional art academy. Our students have backgrounds as graphic and web designers, media artists and activists, but also include architects, fine artists and even a dancer. Our common interest is to critically think about digital and computer media, and create one's own media work based on that thinking and research. The most simple formula we use is the following: it's media design as design of media, not just with media. And that's where Free Software and Open Source come in - because they provide the building blocks for these self-created media.
So when we talk about Free and Open Source (FLOSS) in our department, we do not simply mean the scenario of replacing Photoshop with The Gimp, Max/MSP with Pure Data, Cinema 4d with Blender, and so on. We are more interested in FLOSS as an entry point into a different media practice - based on a comprehensive critical rethinking of communication in its relation to technology. Apart from that, we have a very practical interest in the non-mainstream tools and work flows provided by Open Source and Free Software (ref web 2.0 suicide machine). This puts us into a different camp than even the GNU Project of the Free Software Foundation because our concern is not to obtain free alternatives to existing software, no matter how this software is designed.
(Former co-course director) Matthew Fuller would use the example of "vapourware", software that is announced and discussed without ever being actually released to the public (or perhaps even being written at all), as a simple example of how software is a cultural, and not just technical phenomenon.
For example this piece evokes software, while taking the form of stickers.
Using open source in art education is also about using new methodologies and approaches to teaching. Traditionally "good design" is equated with notions of "simplicity" and "seamlessness". The Faux-metal skins popular in current interface design seems to respond to a need to reassure the user of a stability and sturdiness. Free software often reveals the underlying assumptions and decisions that have been in the design of software and confronts the user take an active position in how they want to work, with what tools on what terms. Open source confronts students with the fact that software is developed in communities, with differing philosophies / approaches / priorities.
Presents wikipedia articles as a dramatic conversation over time, as opposed to a seamless essay.
For me personally, as a software developer, the experience of working with free software has encouraged me to shift from a "make everything from scratch" way of thinking to one that is more modular, and which looks towards tapping into existing code and software communities; I've come to value the creative potential of simply making novel connections between existing systems; In addition, conceiving a project as a pipeline opens it up to collaboration, and broadens the range of your work beyond your own particular skills or interests.
The pipeline, as an approach to creating an artistic work, is in dramatic contrast to a traditional image of the "isolated artist working in the 'clean room' of his/her creative suite..." and recasts work as being a flow of material across different sources. aknowledges that the tools are themselves represent decisions, assumptions, work of others, negotations/compromises
Often a project can have a powerful impact simply by making an unexpected connection between systems.
(many ppl thought it was a crack.)
We are also critical about the typical divide between designers on the one side and engineers on the other. It's the classical new media trap where the artist develops the vision, the technician the code, and the result is disappointing because neither speak each other's language.
You could say that FLOSS Artistic tools are not as professional as the Adobe suite. I think we are in the same situation as database servers in the 1990's. MySQL was criticized for lacking the full feature set of Oracle, just as the GIMP is now criticized for lacking the features of Photoshop. The breakthough of MySQL came with the rise of the web, and the need to have simple flexible solutions without licensing fees. Unlike photoshop, the gimp can be run on a server to generate graphics in real time. In addition, the growing important generative design creates an ideal situation for Open source tools.
One of the key aspect of the program is to get students to question their work flows, their tools, their assumptions. A key challenge is getting students to stop thinking in terms of "what can the software do for me", and switch the mentality to "what can I do with software",and eventually create their own programs. This means to pull students out of a production mode of "getting things done" and into a more reflective manner of work. The complexity inherent to using Free Software is often very good for this purpose. (Even if we are repeating ourselves here, it's still important to keep stressing it:) We would like to encourage FLOSS developers not to strive for a better Photoshop, a better Illustrator or a better Final Cut Pro, but build artistic design tools on the traditional virtues of programmable and networked Free Software. We need more software projects that are low level enough to allow artists and designers to develop their your own GUI metaphors, command line tools and of course artistic software, while - at the same time - being accessible and usable without a degree in Computer Science. Software like the Unix/GNU text tools, ImageMagick, and frameworks like MLT really shine in this respect.
These are concrete practical issues for us. But there's also the level of media theory and criticism which is integral to our study programme and the way we work and think. Free Software and Open Source is useful in this context, too. It can serve as a critical tool because it cuts into all major social, economic, political and artistic issues of information ownership, media governance and participation. However, it is no magical bullet.
Looking at the founding manifesto of the Open Source movement, Eric S. Raymond's "The Cathedral and the Bazaar", we see that it is based on the notion that an open system, or a free flow of information and labor, will result in a self-regulating whole providing optimal solutions for everyone. Today, we now that this has been over-optimistic thinking of the 1990s.
If we see where Free Software and Open Source are today, more than ten years after Raymond's manifesto, then some questions need to be asked: In the Internet 'cloud', in all kinds of embedded devices from routers to media players, and now on mobile phones, Free Software is mostly used as a cheap productivity stack underneath proprietary technology. The "world domination" it achieved this way is quite different from the one imagined in the 1990s. But investigating such questions is exactly what makes a study programme like ours more engaging, and hopefully helps us to have a larger vision of media and design.
(image: mac_issues)
Early in the course, we have sessions to install Linux onto student's laptops (often leaving their original OS -- Mac or Windows -- intact). The experience is an important one -- a key moment to confront students with a question of what exactly is the computer in front of them?
(image: Ted Nelson: Computer Lib)
Breaking through the glossy veneer of a polished operating system designed to "just work", is a crucial first step in understanding the computer and it's software as a socially constructed assemblage: of electronic components, of software, of legal agreements all with a particular history.
(image: Danja: meme 2.0) (for example this is Danja Vasilijev's implementation of a web server as a physical object)
Ultimately it's about instilling a sense of empowerment as what was previously a "magic box", something you ought not to tamper with, becomes a platform for actively re-imagining / rethinking what computers and software can be.
There, were, however a number of issues:
These issues are less pronounced for web-based work. Linux and FLOSS are the software that drives the Internet. If students develop web applications, then this is the technology they need to learn as media designers and artists.
We fully switched to GNU/Linux when we decided that in a media study program computers are instruments much like musical instruments in a conservatory. Just as every music student brings their own instrument, we asked every student to bring their own laptop to the course, and provided Linux installation support. In that year, Linux broke through as operating system used by our students - and not just by staff - because it ran on all machines no matter whether originally designed for Mac OS or Windows. As a lingua franca, it allowed our students to better exchange knowledge and help each other. We also got a whole generation of students who appreciated Linux for actually being different, instead of just claiming to "think different".
Some details: (images)
Shahee scraped data from Wikipedia pages, an visualized the length of time leaders have been in office by the width of their frame (the longer in power, the larger the frame). At the time of the final exhibition, Maumoon Gayoom, the leader of the Maldives was in the third position (having been in power since 1978). In 2008, Gayoom lost the presidential election.
Also: [1], as an example of how a simple assignment (make an edit on Wikipedia) lead Shahee to upload a personal picture (which he took from the cockpit of a plane once when returning home) on to the page of the Maldives; I believe the positive reponse to the picture (to judge by its history of use in Wikipedia) helped contribute to Shahee's interest in working with Wikipedia data in his final project.
A school is not an open-source project, nevertheless good lessons can be learned from open-source development:
These are not only good principles for advanced art school education, but also very healthy recipes for the art world in general.
![[1]](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Male-total.jpg#filehistory){kind=link}