Communication in the Cold War: Difference between revisions

From Fabulous Loop de Loop
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "I feel the need to cite ''Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry''(1951) in its context, as a Cold War text. Bateson & Rauch’s book argues for the uniqueness of the...")
 
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I feel the need to cite ''Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry''(1951) in its context, as a Cold War text. Bateson & Rauch’s book argues for the uniqueness of the American subject, whose conception of freedom and creativity are incubated in an advanced technological context. This American (social-)psychological subject differs from the European and is embedded within a context in which communication is valued as a fundamental human trait: “communication is the substance of common being”.<ref>''Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry''</ref> For Bateson-Ruesch. American communications technology is an extension of the historical democratic process and is a development on the social models of Europe (which are hidebound by irrational tradition) and the Soviet model (which is totalitarian and which engenders conformity). Bateson-Ruesch accord technological advancement, particularly communication technologies, prime agency in a broader historical and cultural process which sees outdated epistemologies superseded by the communications model.  
I feel the need to situate ''Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry'' (1951) in its historical context, as a document of the Cold War. Bateson & Ruesch’s book argues for the uniqueness of the American subject, whose conception of freedom and creativity are incubated in an advanced technological context. This American (social-)psychological subject differs from the European and is embedded within a context in which communication is valued as a fundamental human trait: “communication is the substance of common being”.<ref>''Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry''</ref> For Bateson-Ruesch, American communications technology is an extension of the historical democratic process and is a development on the social models of Europe (which are hidebound by irrational tradition) and the Soviet model (which is totalitarian and which engenders conformity). Bateson-Ruesch accord technological advancement, particularly communication technologies, prime agency in a broader historical and cultural process which sees outdated epistemologies superseded by the communications model.  
 
Back to [[Negative Entropy – Bateson - Freud]]


[[Category:Parallel Text]]
[[Category:Parallel Text]]

Latest revision as of 12:27, 26 June 2021

I feel the need to situate Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry (1951) in its historical context, as a document of the Cold War. Bateson & Ruesch’s book argues for the uniqueness of the American subject, whose conception of freedom and creativity are incubated in an advanced technological context. This American (social-)psychological subject differs from the European and is embedded within a context in which communication is valued as a fundamental human trait: “communication is the substance of common being”.[1] For Bateson-Ruesch, American communications technology is an extension of the historical democratic process and is a development on the social models of Europe (which are hidebound by irrational tradition) and the Soviet model (which is totalitarian and which engenders conformity). Bateson-Ruesch accord technological advancement, particularly communication technologies, prime agency in a broader historical and cultural process which sees outdated epistemologies superseded by the communications model.

Back to Negative Entropy – Bateson - Freud

  1. Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry