Communication in the Cold War: Difference between revisions

From Fabulous Loop de Loop
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I feel the need to cite ''Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry''(1951) in its context, as a Cold War text. Bateson & Rauch’s book argues for the uniqueness of the American subject, whose conception of freedom and creativity are incubated in an advanced technological context. This American (social-)psychological subject differs from the European and is embedded within a context in which communication is valued as a fundamental human trait: “communication is the substance of common being”.<ref>''Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry''</ref> For Bateson-Ruesch, American communications technology is an extension of the historical democratic process and is a development on the social models of Europe (which are hidebound by irrational tradition) and the Soviet model (which is totalitarian and which engenders conformity). Bateson-Ruesch accord technological advancement, particularly communication technologies, prime agency in a broader historical and cultural process which sees outdated epistemologies superseded by the communications model.  
I feel the need to situate ''Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry'' (1951) in its historical context, as a document of the Cold War. Bateson & Ruesch’s book argues for the uniqueness of the American subject, whose conception of freedom and creativity are incubated in an advanced technological context. This American (social-)psychological subject differs from the European and is embedded within a context in which communication is valued as a fundamental human trait: “communication is the substance of common being”.<ref>''Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry''</ref> For Bateson-Ruesch, American communications technology is an extension of the historical democratic process and is a development on the social models of Europe (which are hidebound by irrational tradition) and the Soviet model (which is totalitarian and which engenders conformity). Bateson-Ruesch accord technological advancement, particularly communication technologies, prime agency in a broader historical and cultural process which sees outdated epistemologies superseded by the communications model.  
 
Back to [[Negative Entropy – Bateson - Freud]]


[[Category:Parallel Text]]
[[Category:Parallel Text]]

Latest revision as of 12:27, 26 June 2021

I feel the need to situate Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry (1951) in its historical context, as a document of the Cold War. Bateson & Ruesch’s book argues for the uniqueness of the American subject, whose conception of freedom and creativity are incubated in an advanced technological context. This American (social-)psychological subject differs from the European and is embedded within a context in which communication is valued as a fundamental human trait: “communication is the substance of common being”.[1] For Bateson-Ruesch, American communications technology is an extension of the historical democratic process and is a development on the social models of Europe (which are hidebound by irrational tradition) and the Soviet model (which is totalitarian and which engenders conformity). Bateson-Ruesch accord technological advancement, particularly communication technologies, prime agency in a broader historical and cultural process which sees outdated epistemologies superseded by the communications model.

Back to Negative Entropy – Bateson - Freud

  1. Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry