NEW LEFT–COUNTERCULTURE: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<p class=" | <p class="pt-link">[[The Fabulous Loop de Loop#NEW LEFT–COUNTERCULTURE|The Fabulous Loop de Loop]]</p> | ||
<p class="parallel-text"> | <p class="parallel-text"> | ||
ANNOTATION:<br> | ANNOTATION:<br> | ||
Latest revision as of 10:43, 1 December 2020
ANNOTATION:
|...| Fred Turner From Counterculture to Cyberculture, 2008
|...| Steve Rushton Masters of Reality, 2011
I wrote: "Fred Turner’s book From Counterculture to Cyberculture (2008) distinguishes two political trends that emerged in the United States during the 1960s. These can be broadly categorized as the ‘new left’ and the ‘counterculture’. The new left emerged from the civil rights and anti-war movements. This group understood the world as driven by the material realities of class, race and labour. The second group, the counterculture, emerged from a heady blend of beatnik literature and cybernetics, which understood individuals and systems (including ecological systems) as comprising networks which exchanged information with others. In this scheme the media could be understood as a media-ecology, the evolution of which could be redirected. The experimenters with LSD understood the drug as a technology of the self, as a form of software that could re-programme a group or individual. The underlying philosophy of the network was also a major inspiration for 700,000 individuals to set up a series of communities throughout the United States between 1967 and 1971."
[1]
Note: Ken Kesey’s second Novel Sometimes a Great Notion was a tribute to rugged individualism, it had a strike-breaker as the hero and union men as the bad guys – an indication that the Counterculture of the 1960s had a very different political DNA to the New Left. [2]
The new left and the counterculture
New left =
Ideology (implicit):
Class critique
Critique of technology
Critique of capitalism
Critique of industrial, military, state complex
Action:
Non-violent protest
Civil disobedience
Policy:
Anti- Viet Nam war
Pro civil rights
Extend social democracy
Counterculture =
Ideology (reflexive):
Libertarian
Individualism
Suspicion of state structures
Positive toward technological change
Action:
Affirm pleasure
Affirm personal experience
Refuse to legitimate authority
Set up autonomous systems
Ethos (implicit):
Self-sufficient
Pragmatic