BATESON–LACAN: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 12:50, 24 November 2020

NOTE:

Had Lacan read Bateson-Rausch's Communication: The Social Matrix of Psychiatry(1951)?

Through his association with Jakobson, Levi-Strauss, and Guilbaud, Lacan was aware of the major developments in communications theory. Lacan was familiar with major works by leading U.S cyberneticians, including that of Wiener, Shannon and Von Neumann. It is likely he would have been conscious of Bateson’s work, particularly as Bateson was at that time at the centre of the discourse of (American) psychiatry which critiqued Freudian energetics and because of Bateson's involvement with the Macy Conferences of Cybernetics (1956-1953). Bateson's anthropological approach to epistemology was also similar to Lacan's.

In Lacan's Cybernetics, Svitlana Matviyenko writes: "Anthony Wilden, social theorist and enthusiastic promoter of Lacan’s work in 1960s and 1970s, wrote several books pursuing this idea and developing parallels between Lacan and second-order cybernetics. In particular, he observed the affinity between the work of Lacan and Gregory Bateson and, according to Lacan in Seminar XX, kept encouraging him to read Bateson’s Steps to An Ecology of Mind. However, Lacan resisted this comparison and was critical of Bateson notion of 'metalogue'" in, Svitlana Matviyenko, Lacan's Cybernetics, The University of Western Ontario, 2016 p.34

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 NOTE:
-Had Lacan read Bateson-Rausch's ''Communication: The Social Matrix of Psychiatry''(1951)? Through his association with Jakobson and Levi-Strauss, and Guilbaud, Lacan was aware of the major developments in communications theory. Lacan was familiar with major works by leading U.S cyberneticians, including that of Wiener, Shannon and Von Neumann. It is likely he would have been conscious of Bateson’s work, particularly as Bateson was at that time at the centre of the discourse of (American) psychiatry which critiqued Freudian energetics and because of Bateson's involvement with the Macy Conferences of Cybernetics (1956-1953). Bateson's anthropological approach to epistemology was also similar to Lacan's.
+Had Lacan read Bateson-Rausch's ''Communication: The Social Matrix of Psychiatry''(1951)?
+Through his association with Jakobson, Levi-Strauss, and Guilbaud, Lacan was aware of the major developments in communications theory. Lacan was familiar with major works by leading U.S cyberneticians, including that of Wiener, Shannon and Von Neumann. It is likely he would have been conscious of Bateson’s work, particularly as Bateson was at that time at the centre of the discourse of (American) psychiatry which critiqued Freudian energetics and because of Bateson's involvement with the Macy Conferences of Cybernetics (1956-1953). Bateson's anthropological approach to epistemology was also similar to Lacan's.
 In Lacan's Cybernetics, Svitlana Matviyenko writes: "Anthony Wilden, social theorist and enthusiastic promoter of Lacan’s work in 1960s and 1970s, wrote several books pursuing this idea and developing parallels between Lacan and second-order cybernetics. In particular, he observed the affinity between the work of Lacan and Gregory Bateson and, according to Lacan in Seminar XX, kept encouraging him to read Bateson’s ''Steps to An Ecology of Mind''. However, Lacan resisted this comparison and was critical of Bateson notion of 'metalogue'" in, Svitlana Matviyenko, Lacan's Cybernetics, The University of Western Ontario, 2016 p.34
 [[Category: Parallel Text]]