Communication in the Cold War: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "I feel the need to cite ''Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry''(1951) in its context, as a Cold War text. Bateson & Rauch’s book argues for the uniqueness of the...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I feel the need to cite ''Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry''(1951) in its context, as a Cold War text. Bateson & Rauch’s book argues for the uniqueness of the American subject, whose conception of freedom and creativity are incubated in an advanced technological context. This American (social-)psychological subject differs from the European and is embedded within a context in which communication is valued as a fundamental human trait: “communication is the substance of common being”.<ref>''Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry''</ref> For Bateson-Ruesch | I feel the need to cite ''Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry''(1951) in its context, as a Cold War text. Bateson & Rauch’s book argues for the uniqueness of the American subject, whose conception of freedom and creativity are incubated in an advanced technological context. This American (social-)psychological subject differs from the European and is embedded within a context in which communication is valued as a fundamental human trait: “communication is the substance of common being”.<ref>''Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry''</ref> For Bateson-Ruesch, American communications technology is an extension of the historical democratic process and is a development on the social models of Europe (which are hidebound by irrational tradition) and the Soviet model (which is totalitarian and which engenders conformity). Bateson-Ruesch accord technological advancement, particularly communication technologies, prime agency in a broader historical and cultural process which sees outdated epistemologies superseded by the communications model. | ||
[[Category:Parallel Text]] | [[Category:Parallel Text]] | ||
Revision as of 12:12, 26 June 2021
I feel the need to cite Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry(1951) in its context, as a Cold War text. Bateson & Rauch’s book argues for the uniqueness of the American subject, whose conception of freedom and creativity are incubated in an advanced technological context. This American (social-)psychological subject differs from the European and is embedded within a context in which communication is valued as a fundamental human trait: “communication is the substance of common being”.[1] For Bateson-Ruesch, American communications technology is an extension of the historical democratic process and is a development on the social models of Europe (which are hidebound by irrational tradition) and the Soviet model (which is totalitarian and which engenders conformity). Bateson-Ruesch accord technological advancement, particularly communication technologies, prime agency in a broader historical and cultural process which sees outdated epistemologies superseded by the communications model.
- ↑ Communication, the Social Matrix of Psychiatry