Talk:Introduction: The Foundations of a Cybernetic Discourse: Difference between revisions

From Fabulous Loop de Loop
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
What did pragmatism do?
Notes and feedback
Doing pragmaticism
 
Wiki = pragmatism (emphasis on Peirce, James and Emerson) its links to the experimental epistemology of Kenneth Craik, McCulloch, Wiener and Bateson.
 
Sept= pragmatism overview = the stakes
Oct= stakes and similarities
Nov= differences that make a difference
Peirce and proof. James and “relativism”
James and difference
Bateson and fallibility as method
 




  Aug 21''' SA's comments''': I have made a number of minor edits throughout. largely punctuation and things. some rough left over reference numbers.  
  Aug 21''' SA's comments''': I have made a number of minor edits throughout. largely punctuation and things. some rough left over reference numbers.  


I am not happy with how I have left the end of loop de
  I am not happy with how I have left the end of loop de


"Butler’s materialist conception of the continuity of mind was extended into the twentieth century by the thinkers discussed in The Fabulous Loop de Loop – including Wiener, Korzybski, Craik, McCulloch, and Bateson, through whom we see an increasingly precise articulation of the relation between process and mind."
"Butler’s materialist conception of the continuity of mind was extended into the twentieth century by the thinkers discussed in The Fabulous Loop de Loop – including Wiener, Korzybski, Craik, McCulloch, and Bateson, through whom we see an increasingly precise articulation of the relation between process and mind."


something in it is not sitting right - in both active address and how the articulation is specified but I will come back to it (I feel like its a bit important as the last sentence to wrap it up in a bow, although, of course, it is leading on to another page (which I suggest - as stated in the pad- should be the chapter introductions).
something in it is not sitting right - in both active address and how the articulation is specified but I will come back to it (I feel like its a bit important as the last sentence to wrap it up in a bow, although, of course, it is leading on to another page (which I suggest - as stated in the pad- should be the chapter introductions).

Revision as of 10:56, 7 February 2022

Notes and feedback 


Aug 21 SA's comments: I have made a number of minor edits throughout. largely punctuation and things. some rough left over reference numbers. 

 I am not happy with how I have left the end of loop de

"Butler’s materialist conception of the continuity of mind was extended into the twentieth century by the thinkers discussed in The Fabulous Loop de Loop – including Wiener, Korzybski, Craik, McCulloch, and Bateson, through whom we see an increasingly precise articulation of the relation between process and mind." 

something in it is not sitting right - in both active address and how the articulation is specified but I will come back to it (I feel like its a bit important as the last sentence to wrap it up in a bow, although, of course, it is leading on to another page (which I suggest - as stated in the pad- should be the chapter introductions).
Retrieved from "http://hub.xpub.nl/rushtonhosts/fabulousloopdeloop/index.php?title=Talk:Introduction:_The_Foundations_of_a_Cybernetic_Discourse&oldid=6351"